|
|
Dave Zweifel |
Dave Zweifel: Jason Blair isn't the only deceiver
By Dave Zweifel May 23, 2003
Email
this story to a friend
Printer-friendly
format
Tell
us what you think Write a letter to the editor.
|
About Dave
Dave Zweifel has been editor of The Capital
Times since 1983. A native of New Glarus, Wis. and a graduate
of the University of Wisconsin-Madison, his life-long goal was
to be the editor of this newspaper. He has had more luck
achieving that than his other fondest hope — watching the
Chicago Cubs win the World Series. He served for many years as
president of the Wisconsin Freedom of Information Council and
served two years as a juror for the Pulitzer Prizes.
Email Dave |
Reporter Jayson Blair's ability to deceive his editors at the New
York Times is bad enough, but it pales in comparison to the U.S.
military's apparent deception of the U.S. media last month.
If we are to believe an investigation by the British Broadcasting
Corp., which as far as I know has no axes to grind in any of this,
the entire "heroic" rescue of Pvt. Jessica Lynch was nothing more
than outright military propaganda.
I personally started to wonder about the Lynch rescue shortly
after we ran a Washington Post story on the front page of our April
3 editions that reported Lynch was fighting to the death when she
and the rest of her unit were captured by the Iraqi military. The
story, which was based on unnamed military sources, said that the
West Virginia soldier "continued firing at the Iraqis even after she
sustained multiple gunshot wounds" and that she was even stabbed
when the Iraqis closed in.
It was a story that described uncommon heroism and I ordered it
to appear on Page 1 as did dozens of other editors across the
country. Stories that moved on the wire in ensuing days, however,
appeared to contradict the Post's story. Doctors who examined Lynch
after she got back to our hospitals reported that she was not shot
or stabbed, but her injuries were incurred when the truck she was in
overturned.
That, however, was only part of the strange and conflicting
"facts" associated with the story. None of it, by the way,
diminishes the trauma and military dedication on the part of Lynch.
It now appears, though, that she may have been exploited by the
Defense Department's public information folks.
Los Angeles Times columnist Robert Scheer, who has seen the BBC
account, reported "her story is one of the most stunning pieces of
news management ever conceived."
"Sadly," Scheer said, "almost nothing fed to reporters about
either Lynch's original capture by Iraqi forces or her 'rescue' by
U.S. forces turns out to be true."
The American media were told, and they dutifully reported, that
Lynch was saved by Special Forces that stormed the Iraqi hospital
where she was being held and, in the face of heavy hostile fire,
managed to scoop her up and helicopter her out.
But according to the BBC, the truth appears to be that not only
had Iraqi forces abandoned the area before the rescue, but the
hospital's staff had informed U.S. forces of this and made
arrangements two days before the raid to turn Lynch over to the
Americans.
"But as the ambulance, with Pvt. Lynch inside, approached the
checkpoint, American troops opened fire, forcing it to flee back to
the hospital. The Americans had almost killed their prize catch,"
the BBC reported, according to Scheer.
"We were surprised," Dr. Anmar Uday told the BBC. "There was no
military, there were no soldiers in the hospital. It was like a
Hollywood film. The U.S. forces cried, 'Go, go, go' with guns and
blanks without bullets, blanks and the sound of explosions. They
made a show for the American attack on the hospital."
The network added that footage from the raid was shot not by
journalists, but by soldiers with night-vision cameras, which was
fed in real time to the central command in Qatar and was edited by
the Pentagon and released as proof that a battle to free Lynch had
occurred when it had not.
Published: 6:40 AM
5/23/03 |