POLL ANALYSES
May 30, 2003
Public Remains Skeptical of News Media
Majority of Americans believe news
organizations often get facts wrong
by Mark Gillespie
GALLUP NEWS SERVICE
PRINCETON, NJ -- Jayson Blair's reporting will be discussed for
years to come in the nation's journalism schools -- as an example of
how not to be a reporter. Blair resigned under pressure from the
New York Times May 1 after he was caught faking news stories
and plagiarizing from other reporters. The revelation has since been
the subject of an exhaustive report in the Times, as well as
other publications. In addition, another Times correspondent,
Rick Bragg, resigned earlier this week after being suspended for
relying extensively on the work of a free-lance journalist for
stories that carried his byline.
While Americans have historically viewed the news media with a
jaundiced eye, a new Gallup Poll conducted May 19-21, in the wake of
the Blair scandal, found that 62% of Americans now believe news
organizations are often inaccurate in their reporting. Just 36%
believe media outlets "get the facts straight."
This feeling has grown considerably since Gallup first asked the
question in 1985. At that time, 55% of Americans felt that news
stories were accurate, while 34% said the reports were often
inaccurate. In later years, feelings became more evenly divided, but
a sea change took place following the 2000 presidential election. A
Gallup Poll conducted in December of that year -- during the
post-election controversy in Florida -- found that 65% rated news
stories as "often inaccurate," while just 32% called the coverage
accurate. The same question asked in a Gallup Poll conducted
February 17-19, 2003 found that 58% rated news stories as "often
inaccurate," compared to 39% who rated them as accurate.
For all the perceived anti-media bias among conservatives, there
is remarkably little difference between the politically conservative
and the politically liberal on this question. Among conservatives,
68% rate news stories as "often inaccurate." However, 61% of
liberals say the same thing. There are more striking differences
based on education -- those with only a high school education or
less are far more likely to be critical of news organizations than
are those who have attended college.
The perception of biased or error-filled reporting may be more
focused when one is the subject of a news story. One out of four
Americans surveyed told Gallup interviewers they had personally been
involved in a situation that was the subject of news coverage.
However, members of this group were far more likely to rate the
coverage of their own stories as accurate -- 78% said this, compared
to 22% who said reporters did not tell their stories accurately.
Public Gives Media Credit for Correcting Mistakes
Every day, the New York Times prints an accounting of
previous mistakes and errors on page three, as do many other
newspapers (broadcast media outlets are far less likely to report
corrections, perhaps because they are not archived in libraries for
future reference, as newspapers tend to be). While a majority of
Americans rate news coverage as "often inaccurate," they do
recognize that newspapers attempt to rectify their errors. Nearly
two out of three (63%) say newspapers are willing to print
corrections when their stories contain errors. By way of comparison,
36% think newspapers are unwilling to correct mistakes.
Public Not Following Blair Scandal Closely
When asked how closely they were following news coverage of the
Jayson Blair incident, 34% said they had paid close attention to the
story. By way of comparison, 26% said they had followed the Blair
case "not too closely" and 39% said they had not followed it at all.
This is a far lower level of attention than many other news stories
have received over the past decade, including the recent war with
Iraq, the deaths of Princess Diana and John F. Kennedy Jr., and the
2000 presidential election.
Survey Methods
These results are based on telephone interviews with a randomly
selected national sample of 1,014 adults, 18 years and older,
conducted May 19-21, 2003. For results based on this sample, one can
say with 95 percent confidence that the maximum error attributable
to sampling and other random effects is ±3 percentage points. In
addition to sampling error, question wording and practical
difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into
the findings of public opinion polls.
In general, do you think -- [ROTATED: news organizations get
the facts straight, (or do you think) news organizations' stories
and reports are often inaccurate]?
|
Facts straight |
Often inaccurate |
No opinion |
|
% |
% |
% |
2003 May 19-21 |
36 |
62 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
2003 Feb 17-19 |
39 |
58 |
3 |
2000 Dec 2-4 |
32 |
65 |
3 |
1998 Jul 13-14 ^ |
50 |
45 |
5 |
1989 Aug 9-28 ^ |
54 |
44 |
2 |
1988 Aug 24 ^ |
40 |
50 |
10 |
1988 May 13 ^ |
48 |
43 |
9 |
1988 Jan 8-17 ^ |
44 |
48 |
8 |
1985 Aug 17 ^ |
50 |
38 |
12 |
1985 Jun 22 ^ |
55 |
34 |
11 |
|
|
|
|
^ |
Items not rotated. WORDING: In general, do you think news
organizations get the facts straight, or do you think that
their stories and reports are often
inaccurate? |
How willing do you think newspapers are to print corrections
when their stories contain errors -- very willing, somewhat willing,
not too willing, or not at all willing?
|
Very willing |
Somewhat willing |
Not too willing |
Not at all willing |
No opinion |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
2003 May 19-21 |
16 |
47 |
28 |
8 |
1 |
How closely have you followed the news about the New York
Times reporter named Jayson Blair who resigned after it was
discovered that he falsified stories -- very closely, somewhat
closely, not too closely, or not at all?
|
Very closely |
Somewhat closely |
Not too closely |
Not at all
|
No opinion |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
2003 May 19-21 |
7 |
27 |
26 |
39 |
1 |
Have you ever been involved in a situation that was the subject
of a news story or news stories, or not?
|
Yes |
No |
No opinion |
|
% |
% |
% |
2003 May 19-21 |
25 |
75 |
* |
* Less than 0.5% |
Generally speaking, do you think that this news story or
stories that you were involved in were mostly accurate or mostly
inaccurate?
BASED ON -- 262 -- ADULTS WHO HAVE EVER BEEN INVOLVED IN A
SITUATION THAT WAS THE SUBJECT OF A NEWS STORY OR NEWS STORIES
|
Accurate |
Inaccurate |
No opinion |
|
% |
% |
% |
2003 May 19-21 |
78 |
22 |
* |
* Less than 0.5% |
COMBINED RESPONSES (Q.29-30)
|
2003 May 19-21 |
|
% |
Involved in a situation that was a subject of a news
story or news stories |
25 |
(Mostly accurate) |
(20) |
(Mostly inaccurate) |
(5) |
(Unsure) |
(*) |
|
|
Not involved in a news story or news stories |
75 |
|
|
No opinion |
* |
* Less than 0.5% |
|